韩国三级视频-日韩操-视频一二区-久草欧美-五月天婷婷丁香花-动漫美女靠逼-韩国一区二区三区视频-美女扒开内裤让男人桶-亚洲AV无码精品一区二区三区-无码内射中文字幕岛国片-亚洲成色网

Australian tax agency to crack down on lawyers protecting tax-evading clients

Source: Xinhua| 2019-02-13 11:51:11|Editor: Xiang Bo
Video PlayerClose

CANBERRA, Feb. 13 (Xinhua) -- Australia's tax collector has announced a crackdown on lawyers who misuse legal privilege to protect their clients.

In a post on its website, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) said it was preparing to launch "range of (legal) cases in the short to medium term" against offending lawyers who would face a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment.

Under Australian law, courts and law enforcement agencies cannot compel legal practitioners to disclose communications with their clients.

However, ATO alleges that lawyers are using the power to shield their clients from convictions for tax evasion, protecting thousands of documents sought by the agency.

"It's just multiple orders of magnitude over what you'd expect for an ordinary privilege claim," Deputy Commissioner Jeremy Hirschhorn told News Corp Australia on Wednesday.

"The thing we have seen hints of, which I hope not to be the case, is the firm helping the client discover its non-tax purpose.

"The firm says, 'Here's some we prepared earlier which you may find useful', which are then presented to the commissioner as the real justification.

He said that the ATO would target a small number of legal practitioners at Australia's leading firms.

The use of privilege has become a major challenge for government agency's to overcome in recent months.

National Australia Bank (NAB) in August 2018 unsuccessfully claimed privilege over documents related to its fee-for-no-service misconduct that it did not want scrutinized by the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Service Industry.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the nation's corporate regulator, is currently fighting financial services giant AMP in the Federal Court over AMP's refusal to produce its own fee-for-no-service documents, over which it has claimed legal privilege.

TOP STORIES
EDITOR’S CHOICE
MOST VIEWED
EXPLORE XINHUANET
010020070750000000000000011100001378181871
主站蜘蛛池模板: 吉首市| 奈曼旗| 长沙市| 剑川县| 德惠市| 南岸区| 新竹县| 浦城县| 合作市| 满城县| 柳河县| 开江县| 封开县| 共和县| 铅山县| 全州县| 乡宁县| 镶黄旗| 五指山市| 林芝县| 平南县| 汕头市| 砚山县| 平顶山市| 乌鲁木齐县| 兰坪| 泾源县| 晋州市| 苍山县| 江山市| 长兴县| 保山市| 印江| 库尔勒市| 石台县| 绥滨县| 竹山县| 加查县| 龙游县| 东平县| 巴林右旗|